About Me

My photo
My name is Rachel, I have two silly sibling, one older sister and one younger brother. I have graduated from University of Oregon with my BA in commicative disorder and I have graduated from Missouri State Unierstity with my Masters in Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Currently, I am a Deaf Ed teacher in Missouri. I am enjoying the ups and downs of teaching.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Chapter 4 and 5

Reading these two chapters, I feel like it was all a review. It was all about the various approaches that are in Deaf Education. It compares the Auditory-Oral Approach vs. the Visual-Manual Approach.

In the Auditory-Oral Approach there are two different programs that is under that umbrella. They are Auditory-Verbal and Cued Speech.
  • Auditory-Oral Approach main focus is on spoken language skills. The children that are in this program almost has a form of amplification and are taught to listen to themselves and how they produce speech. This way they can know when they are making speech errors and can self correct themselves.
  • Auditory-Verbal Approach is different from the other oral approaches cause it focuses more on audition and less on visual aspect of speech reading.
  • Cued Speech: It is a manual program but keep it separate from sign language. Cued speech is various hand shapes and movements that represent the different phonemes in that can be seen in the English language. Cued speech is paired up with speech, you really cant use it without spoken language cause it wouldn't make sense the
Visual-Manual Approach also is an umbrella terms with programs under it.
  • Visual-Manual Approach is where Sign Language comes into play. It is a system that is manually coded in sign which helps to provided children that are D/HH with instruction
  • Total Communication (TC): it a program that uses whatever the child is comfortable with. That means in one classroom you may have child who signs and another child who uses English. That means as a teacher you would use TC to help both children understand the concept that you are teaching. So you are signing and voicing at the same time
  • Bilingual/Bicultural: It also uses both sign language (ASL) and English. However, its a program that believes that ASL is a language and for most children who are D/HH its their first language. So the program builds up their vocabulary in their natural language (ASL) and then teaches the child how to read and write in English.
Each child is different. In this field we are taught to have the child lead us in which language they will want to use. I think this is really important cause if I child natural language is ASL and you force them to speak, you are making them miss out on all the vocabulary that they might have access too if you accept their natural language and signed to them. For teachers to better serve our kids we really have to teach them in their natural language.

2 comments:

  1. I completely agree with you about teaching the students in their natural language. At my placement in the residential school, their philosophy is total communication. In the classroom I am in, I have to code switch a lot because I have students that rely on my voice but there are others that need ASL. We really need to follow what the child is most comfortable with and not force anything on them. I know this can be difficult because we have to make decisions as early as possible, but we always need to be watching the natural communication of the child.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with both of you. It is our job to give the child what they need. If it calls for code switching so be it. I think a lot of times parents have an idea of how they want their child to be. Sometimes they really try to force that child to be what they want them to be and not what the child wants to be. Therefore, I think it is important for the child to be receiving language support at home as well as at school.

    ReplyDelete